
I had previously used a parody of Baudrillard’s title for one of my lectures at CSM, but in a slightly different form, referring to ‘networks’ in the plural rather than the singular. At the time I was more concerned with the way in which mainstream media networks appeared to be feeding into one another – a process that had begun during Operation Desert Storm and best reflected in the 300% rise in advertising rates imposed by CNN during their coverage of what has now become known as ‘Iraq 1’. Nearly two decades later, advertisers are pulling money out of mainstream TV as their main target audience – made up of males aged between 18 to 35 – drifts away into other parts of the network. It is also from this group that the majority of soldiers currently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan have traditionally been drawn. In 2004, the year of the previous election, two forms of human counting were still conducted on paper rather than digitally over the web: Nielsen ratings and the votes cast by US military personnel serving overseas.
Today, however, increased interest in network theory and network practices has led me to believe that ‘the Network’ should now be referred to as a singular abstract entity in the same way that ‘the Media’ have always been worshipped as an abstract plurality: an electronic pantheon of Hindu deities serving one godhead through their many limbs and attributes. Today we have but the one true Network before us and must respond accordingly.
No comments:
Post a Comment